01/08/2014

Vichy Opposition

Opponents of Vichy by Luis Manuel Aguana the occasion of the 2011 Census has been test the real attitude of some parties and candidates of the democratic opposition in relation to position assume before this new instrument of the regime of Hugo Chavez. The position has been varied before the 2011 Census, from say nothing to declare openly in favor, passing through the analysis of the questionnaire excluding questions considered as serious interference to the privacy of individuals, the TSJ requesting the cancellation of such questions in the questionnaire. I have no intention from these lines divide the organized democratic opposition, set only the existence of the polychromy of our opposition in relation to controversial topics leadership, which in some cases, like the present, border on the contradictory and that put at risk the seriousness and coherence in discourse against the current regime, reason why should not be surprised of the because the opposition country distrusts the leadership of some leaders. I wish to note Here the position that some civil society spokesmen have taken in relation to the 2011 Census doesn't match an antagonistic reaction to wishful thinking. It is a coherent and sustained response to the historical enforceable in this Government that have caused anguish and pain to the Venezuelan family in 13 years. He only mentioned the Tascon list, persecutions and expropriations, the death of Franklin Brito, the vexations Dr. Maria Afiuni and unjust sentence of 30 years to the Commissioners Simonovis, Vivas and Forero, are just a sample that we have valid reasons why concern ourselves before anything to do that it may mean a new episode of persecution. Now well, when one sees on television to presidential candidates of the opposition made publicly on 2011 Census questionnaire knowing better that this situation, nobody can not one less question: to that playing this person? Is it that the Government has given some thing that we don't know? What coherence of speech can can have to condemn the Tascon list and at once endorse another possible violation to the intimacy and privacy of Venezuelans? It is consistency in the enforceable what people see, not what they say leaders.
Jan 8, 2014 6:12:05 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
United Socialist Party Anyway, I say what is mine, and this is that I came from the old year expectations by enjoy filling (the term is not excessive) of the return of the spiteful boy home, hardened by the experience of the rectification. You know, considered the facts of the past, same that forgave up with crucifix in hand, when called to reconciliation; considered the fact that a political leader does not fall as well as so by mere personal whim, when it is based on a significant popular support, something that should teach him once the uselessness of the coup options (bad, you can kill a leader, but dead will be a symbol, and the thing worse); retrained in civility, understanding and conviction to follow the rules of the game to live in democracy, respecting the popular representative content of the counterparty; and considered, first and foremost, in the big mistake of having at her whim of the support voters, delegated to him feeling that turned shredded to abandon their parliamentary seats. As you can see, the event wouldn't be of importance. On par with the brat name of opposition Venezuelan returned to the desk, were expected to favourably surprised everyone with his living attitude, fact that nothing brings humiliation if old we know that recognizing errors is wise. Even had that overcome the malaise that when the name was malcriadamente Assembly scorned a mark of 79 deputies themselves against 86, very different to today's 67 against 98 of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). I.e. a decreased box. It had to be coscorronear and repeated that is not done, gafo boy, this is not done!, with the child that might seem. The fact was that my expectation was to the ground, into the depth of the ravine, toward the muddy...
PREVIOUS POST
Alexander Fleming Most of us play many different roles during any given day. Could be a mom, boss, employee, student or friend, to name a few. Very often we identify with those roles. When asked, "Who are you /" we say, "I am a wife and mother", "I am a physician and amateur photographer." We identify ourselves by the way the world sees us, not what we really are. Our authentic self is what we really are, deep in the core of our being. Our authentic self is not that the world labels us to be. Being authentic is driven by our values and our individual needs. To learn to be our authentic self, we must first discover our authentic self. To discover is to learn of the existence of something. Auto-discovery is learning of the existence of our values and needs. Discovery is not a one-step process. Although there are many a-ha moments "in the discovery, there are a lot of hard work that to do before and after experiencing "moments of a hectare," to incorporate that discovery into our everyday lives. When we say "a-ha" really the adventure and creativity and the value they really need support and love, it's time to incorporate the values and needs in our daily lives. While most of us the date of discovery of penicillin in early 1940, the first "A-" moment came much earlier. Sir Alexander Fleming discovered that mold growing in culture dishes without washing was to repel the bacteria that surround it in 1928.