02/11/2014

NEXT POST
Social Democrat Being such ineluctable truths, there is no doubt that clockwise rotation in the leftist Latin America is brewing. The ruling Liberals is already sick and will soon enter into a coma, but before will contaminate and destroy everything in its path, trying to force his stay in power with his overwhelming totalitarianism. Hugo Chavez reached its political ceiling as candidate for leader continental and will be very difficult that after the failed and vulgar Bolivarian experience, some other country, apart from those that controls, is dominated by the Colonel. Brazil and Argentina whose geopolitical dimension is of utmost importance in the southern hemisphere, are at a critical moment. The first with year-end elections is sliding at high speed by the neocomunista road that masked since the Labour Party took power. Lula da Silva was removed the mask that allowed him to govern as a Social Democrat because I knew that otherwise you wouldn't. His undeserved popularity is a product of the rising prices of raw materials which generated economic growth Brazilian making everyone happy. A monkey without a brain sitting on a branch eating bananas would have achieved the same thing. That made Lula, stay in the mold and not interfere with capitalism while gave speeches pro Socialist and hugged tyrants on the outside. The Argentine experience is more dramatic. The country is shattered, looted, confused, frustrated, without political leaders that present a coherent discourse and enjoy popular representation. The Argentina was left with head attached to Peron, recalling past glories that have nothing to do with the current reality. The Kirchners are dictators light, but dictators at the end. The Argentine armed forces do not want to play any role in politics again, and do well. It is not its role. Every day that passes, the authoritarianism of Cristina...
PREVIOUS POST
Systemization After making an unsystematic first and systematic reading later, trilogy of novels by Samuel Beckett Molloy, Malone dies and the Unnamable (Gove Press. New York, 1955, 1956, 1958) and the novel by Jose Donoso the obscene bird of night (Seix Barral, Spain, 1970), this reader concluded that the significant core of both productions was that of identity as a problem. But despite present versions of the self in emergency, basic conception of identity - perhaps implied - it was opposite in both authors. For example, it is difficult to stop thinking about dopey/Humberto Penaloza in Donoso's novel, in their endless search for identity if we listen to the Innombrable, in the novel by the Irish author and that closes the trilogy of novels previously mentioned cycle. I'm not, no need to say it, Murphy, or Watts, or Mercier, I can not even encourage me to name them, nor to any of the others of same names I forgot, they told me that I was them, that should trying to be them, by compulsion or fear, or to prevent recognize me (The Unnamable, in Three Novels by Samuel Beckett, Grove Press, New York, 1965, p. 326.) Translation mine). To this uncertain individuality will correspond a kind of marginal character in social physical plane: Molloy et Malone meurt ces deux derniers roimans jeu mettent les themes, chers l auteur of the dereliction of the solitude et de egarement., says Dominique Leduc in Samuel Beckett, Hatier, Brussels, 1986, page 12 characters from Beckett from More Pricks than Kicks (1934) and Murphy (1934) to How it is (1961)they correspond, if we want to use a trial of Impressionist, vagabonds, grosella, clochards, physically reduced to a minimum and mentally claudicantes, whose main activity is the permanent and incessant discourse, speculation, the inventory of their possessions...